Climate Hysteria Part2

Fact: Rockefeller together with UN are the creator of climate hysteria.

It is not my voice in my video. I have used a voice over

My video with YouTube

My video with Rumble

I have previously released a video of that describes climate science at https://www.coolingnews.com/climate-hysteria-part1.html

PayPal Acceptance Mark

Few people are looking at climate data or try to understand this. Most people are ruled by emotions and not by facts. The whole climate scare story is based on emotional response.

So this video explains why the cooperation between Rockefeller and the UN lead to the climate hysteria.

Interview with Jacob Nordangård on the Rockefeller family

Lecture with Jacob Nordangård on the Rockefeller connection to climate change theories.

James Delingpole interview with Patrick M Wood on multinational companies and what is called Technocracy. Plus how UN and World Economic Forum fit in on this movement of Technocrasy.

Video by George Hunt which he made just before the UN environmental conference at Rio in 1992 from the Fourth World Wilderness Congress

Here are more details of the connection between Rockefeller and the UN.

https://klimatupplysningen-se.translate.goog/rockefeller-och-klimathotet-del-5-one-world/?_x_tr_sl=sv&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv

Donna Laframboise Interview on the IPCC.

If you haven’t seen The Great Global Warming Swindle, see it! It was true then. It is still true today.

Why do so few react to all the failing climate and environmental prediction of doom.

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/

The video on the Great Reset is great.

Posted in Climate Change, climate hysteria, Climate Science, General, Rockefeller, United Nations | Tagged | 1 Comment

Are air pressure variations over geological times controlling Earth’s climate?

Fossil of a Pterodactyl, a flying lizard, called Quetzalcoatlus that lived about 70 million years ago, just a few million years before the disappearance of the dinosaur, is the largest Pterodactyl that has ever been found. Pterodactyls were not dinosaurs but belonged to another branch of reptiles. They were probably warm blooded. The name Quetzalcoatlus is taken from the Aztec serpent god. If Quetzalcoatlus would exist today they would have a big problem, they couldn’t fly. They were too heavy to take to the air in today’s skies. It was as large as a Cessna airplane and it is estimated that it weighted about 200 kilogram.

Gigant flying rptile

Yet, we know they manage to fly 70 million years ago. The most logical reason they were able to fly, was that the air pressure near sea level was much higher than today. It is estimated to have to have been about 4 atmospheres for the animal to be able to fly.

Here is a lecture on the Quetzalcoatlus flight by astronaut Don Pettit who made me start to think about the potential impacts from pressure variations over geological times.

And if air pressure at that time was that high, this also increased global temperature because of adiabatic pressure. Higher pressure, higher temperature. What do we know of the conditions of the atmosphere over geological times? Not that much. Adiabatic pressure differences cause temperature differences between high altitude (mountains) and sea level. The pressure at Mount Everest is about 30% of that at sea level.

We do know proxy values for CO2 as the stomata density on leaves from fossils can be calculated, which give values for CO2 levels. It is more difficult to know air pressure and the relationship between oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere over geological times. Variations of CO2 levels are claimed by advocates of the dangerous human caused global warming theory to be the dominant force for climate change, despite lack of any evidence for that being the case. Could it instead be cause by air pressure variations?

Given that Quetzalcoatlus is a kind of proxy for air pressure for the period right before the KT boundary, what if variations of air pressure drive climate change or at least are an important part of it?

Imagen that gases released from volcanic activity fills the atmosphere with gases over time and that volcanic and lava lake gas release varies over geological times. At the same time we have loss of gases to space driven by the solar wind which is going on all the time. If volcanic activity is low, Earth is losing gases from the atmosphere. If volcanic activity is high, air pressure is increasing.

I looked at this graph over CO2 and temperature over geological time. I know of two outgassing events. The Siberian trap during the Permian extinction 252 million years ago and the Deccan trap which formed the Western Ghat in India 66 million years ago just before the KY-boundary. And then we have the breakup of Pangea which occurred in steps during the age of the dinosaurs which formed the Atlantic Ocean of today.

At the time of the Permian extinction, which was the largest known extinction, and is associated with the Siberian trap 252 million years ago we can see a sharp increase in temperature and also an increase of CO2. At the time of the Deccan trap near the time of the KT boundary the temperature was also high.

I also found out about a fossil called Argentavis Magnificens which was a bird that lived 6 million years ago that weighted about 60-70 kilogram. It is the largest flying bird we know to have lived. The temperature at the time was lower that of the time of Quetzalcoatlus but higher than that of today. So, the pressure was probably higher than today too. During the Carboniferous and late Permian era large dragonfly insects existed.

I often see claims by advocates of CAGW that the heat of Venus, where the temperature at the surface is warm enough to melt lead, that this is caused by high CO2 levels. This is completely nonsense, as the warm surface is caused by extremely high pressure. The pressure at the surface is 100 atm which is the same pressure 1000 meters bellow the surface of the oceans. Compress the atmosphere to that pressure and you get these temperatures. It doesn’t matter if the atmosphere is mostly CO2 as on Venus or a combination of Nitrogen and Oxygen as we have on Earth. If you have had the same gases on Venus as we have on Earth and it was 100 atm at the surface then you would have the same temperature because of the adiabatic pressure. Because Venus is closer to the Sun than the Earth, it should be warmer from more solar energy. Calculation show that the temperature should be about 50 degree Celsius. If you look at temperature profile of Venus and look at the upper part of its atmosphere then you find that at 1 atm the observed temperature is about 50 C, Coincidence? I think not.

Of the 3 planets Venus, Earth and Mars, Earth is different because Earth has a strong magnetic field and the other two have not. Because water molecules are dipoles, water are kept on Earth as these molecules less easily are lost into space, while the other two planets have no magnetic fields that protect them from water loss. Water has a stabilizing effect on Earth’s climate. Earth is unique in another way as we have tidal effect because of the Moon. This cause turbulence in the upper atmosphere that sends away molecules of oxygen and nitrogen into space. Add to that, that the tidal effect earlier in Earth’s history was much stronger then as the Moon’s orbit was closer than it is today.

A surprise to me has been that climate researchers don’t seem to connect air density variations to climate change over geological times. Instead, they connect climate change to variations of CO2. The correlation between CO2 and temperature is poor, but I can see correlations between CO2 in the age of mammals and temperature. But there is no evidence that CO2 variations is a main climate driver which I show here. https://www.coolingnews.com/climate-hysteria-part1.html

Higher pressure also affect the estimated proxy for CO2 values. CO2 values during higher pressure are too high and should be lowered during higher pressure as more CO2 molecules are absorbed by stomata with higher pressure.

Climate scientists seem to think that the air pressure over geological time has been constant.

To conclude, CO2 variations are not what caused climate variations over geological times, but air pressure variations were.

What do you think?

Tip jar

PayPal Acceptance Mark

You can follow me on LittleIceAge on Twitter

Posted in General | Tagged | 1 Comment

Climate hysteria part1

Climate hysteria data and graphs

I’m making videos that describes how it is possible that the theory of dangerous human caused global warming has taken over the world while there is no evidence that changes in CO2 levels have an important impact on Earth’s climate. In this first video I discuss science and data.

Note: It’s not me talking. I had help from an American voice for that.

The video at YouTube

My video on Rumble

I add here links to 3 videos made by Tony Heller.

The first is an investigation of the US National Climate Assessment Report that was prepared for the Trump administration. In this video he presents a software he did that makes it more easy for climate scientists to cheat and mislead.

The second video describes how the Urban Heat Island effect UHI around Buenos Aires has been mismanaged.

The third video show how temperature on Iceland has been manipulated so that the warm period between 1920 and 1950 was erased. After an Australian politician pointed this out, the temperature graphs were corrected by GISS.

These 3 videos are very instructional in what has been going on by GISS and some climate activist scientists.

Here are my plans for the series of videos I plan to create that combined better answer the question, how it is possible that climate hysteria has taken over the world?

1. How Rockefellers with the help of the UN created this fraud.

2. Why the climate scare is a urban legend created for globalist forces.

3. Climate alarmism and the media

4. My journey

5. Climatgate

6. In the year 2030, is the world going to end or not?

If you like my video and think this information is important, of this hot political topic, please give support via PayPal and Patreon.

PayPal Acceptance Mark

You can also follow me on Twitter at LittleIceAge

See also part2 on Rockefeller and the UN

Climate Hysteria Part2
Posted in Climate Change, climate hysteria, Climate Research, Climate Science, El Niño, ENSO, General, Global Cooling Scare, Global Warming Hoax | 3 Comments

Simple calculations show MJO and QBO oscillations are driven by lunar orbits.

There are two main lunar cycles. Moon’s elliptical orbit orientation rotates. This is called the Anomalistic month. One orbit of this shift in orientation takes 8.850578 years. The Draconic month is the orbit of the points of the lunar orbit where it crosses the Ecliptic Plane and an orbit takes 18.5996 years.
QBO or Quasi-biennial oscillation is variations of the stratospheric wind over the tropics. QBO variations follow a sinusoidal oscillation with a period of about 28 months. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/149/1/012064/pdf


If you take the Draconic Month and divide this with 8 you get 2.325 year. If you calculate the QBO periodicity in years get 2.333 years. These two periods look very similar to me.
I follow a website or to be more correct YouTube videos from Stormsurf which are published weekly by a guy called Mark Sponsler. The first part of his videos are about weather and wave heights in the Pacific Ocean, dedicated to wave surfing, which is of no interest for me. The rest and the main parts of his videos is about MJO and ENSO which is what I’m interested in.
MJO or The Madden-Julian Oscillation is an oscillation which show the precipitation pattern in the tropics. The MJO data is important for weather predictions in the tropics and have impacts on ENSO. MJO is presented as a vector that moves counter clockwise along the equator. This rotation can vary between 30 to 60 days for its counter clockwise rotation. A few months ago, Mark Sponsler explained that the average rotation around the world is 41 days. After hearing that I took up my calculator. I added 2 average rotations which is 82 days. The time between Perigee’s is about 27.5 days. I took 82 and divided this with 27.5. The result was 2.98 which is very close to 3.
So, MJO follow multiples of Moon’s orbit and the Draconic month is 8 multiples of QBO. These correlations show that both QBO and MJO are dependent on Moon’s gravitational forcing.
I would also point out from a study over rainfall over Japan a cycle of 27 days which they link to the sun rotation. The sun’s rotation depends on the latitude on the sun and is not fixed. I think instead the likely cause is the gravitational tidal effect from the moon, 27.5 days.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180717094705.htm

Here is a picture which show MJO daily representations with also includes two 2-weeks forecast in green. One based on a dynamic model and one based on a statistical model.
I’m building up a model where I hope to make longer, and more accurate forecasts models based on lunar and solar forcing. If I’ll succeed, only time will tell. I just finished with calculating key atmospheric tidal data. It has taken a long time.

Picture over SOI 30-day average.
SOI, Southern Oscillation Index, which is the value over pressure difference between Tahiti, in Polynesia and Darwin in Australia is affected by MJO. If MJO is positive over the Kelvin wave generation area east of New Guinea, a Kelvin Waves is generated, which is a pulse of warm water, that move warm water towards South America under the surface. Eventually, after about 3 months after this event, water if conditions are right, surface and may create or feed an El Niño. If you look at this picture above over SOI 30 days average, it is possible to see tagging like drops which is caused by positive SOI values moving over the Pacific. The time differences correspond to the time between 2 or 3 lunar orbits between lunar Perigee’s. Low frequency of SOI has the inverse of the El Niño/La Niña index.
Popular among climatologist and computer modeler is the idea of Chaos Theory. A butterfly flaps its wings and a few years later it’s the cause of a thunderstorm somewhere else in the world. This of course is bunkum, but only just. The real butterflies, much stronger ones, can be found lunar gravitational effects. Also, from the solar and magnetic impacts on the atmosphere. One error, apart from that they include too high climate sensitivity, in their climate models, are that build their models as black boxes where forces from outside are ignored or assumed to be stochastics. If they include lunar and solar forcing these models would perform much better. But, then, their CAGW theory would come crashing down.

Posted in El Niño, ENSO, General, MJO, QBO, SOI | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why climate activist scientists don’t want to debate qualified skeptics?

Normally in science when there are difference points of view on a subject, scientists are eager to debate each other. But this never happens these days in climate science. One exception to that was a debate that took place in New York 10 years ago. The debate didn’t go so well for the CO2 cause climate catastrophe promoting scientists.

As a result of this debate, the leading climate alarmist scientists made a policy decision to never ever have a debate with any qualified global warming skeptic, which sometimes have led to comical situations. Of course, by declaring that there is a scientific consensus on the subject and that the debate is over, they are saying to critics shut up. This is a very effective method to keep the climate hysteria going.

Here is a none debate between Roy Spencer and Gavin Schmidt. Roy Spencer is a scientist which is responsible for a satellite temperature record called UHA. Gavin Schmidt is a scientist at GISS Goddard Institute for Space Studies which is a NASA organization that is responsible for the most often used temperature record based on surface temperature stations. Over time the GISS temperature data record has been adjusted so that old temperature records have been adjusted down and resent temperature records has been adjusted up. This reason for this, it is claimed, is because stations sometimes has been moved or the time of day for the recordings has been changed. At the time of this recording the director of GISS a man called James Hansen. He has been a climate alarmist guru for the environmental movement. He was several times arrested during demonstration sit-ins during his time as a director of GISS. Today the director of GISS is Gavin Schmidt and thus the adjustment of the GISS data record has been accelerated.

What happens when one studies historical climate data? Answer: One finds that the climate is cyclical.

Posted in Climate Change, Climate Research, Climate Science | Tagged , | 1 Comment